![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
A short review of Windows Vista build 5536
Sunday, August 27th, 2006
As the developer in charge of Stardock’s Vista labs, I’m one of the few who gets to
"play" with the new builds right away. Up until now this has meant several hours of reinstalling software over the top of a fresh install. This time I tried an upgrade from 5472 to 5536, and as it’s the way many of you will be introduced to Vista I thought I’d share the results with you. I also wanted to see whether or not I agreed with blogger Robert McLaws, one of those who has been playing around with the interim builds and who has been predicting great improvements . Is he right? Read on for my take . . .
Impressions of 5536…
The setup has started to include the "info cards" - in this case, little messages promising that you, too, can be a great director, famous (PowerPoint) presenter, or maybe even pilot the space shuttle with Windows Vista. Again, Microsoft is trying to push the "experience" on you - and giving you something to look at while you wait for its performance ratings to complete. I’m told a clean install is not that bad, but you have to wonder how many end users are going to be doing a clean install. In truth, the upgrade didn’t take more than around 45 minutes for me, though I’ve had others say it took them over an hour. I could see upgrading from XP taking longer, if only because most upgrade candidates will have big registries and more cruft for the installer to sort through. JoeUser.com - JoeUser.com: Vista 5536: Is there time to fix it?
Popular Posts
Please read our Disclaimer




