Latest Entries

A short review of Windows Vista build 5536

Sunday, August 27th, 2006

As the developer in charge of Stardock’s Vista labs, I’m one of the few who gets to Windows_Vista_56.jpg"play" with the new builds right away. Up until now this has meant several hours of reinstalling software over the top of a fresh install. This time I tried an upgrade from 5472 to 5536, and as it’s the way many of you will be introduced to Vista I thought I’d share the results with you. I also wanted to see whether or not I agreed with blogger Robert McLaws, one of those who has been playing around with the interim builds and who has been predicting great improvements . Is he right? Read on for my take . . .

Impressions of 5536…

The setup has started to include the "info cards" - in this case, little messages promising that you, too, can be a great director, famous (PowerPoint) presenter, or maybe even pilot the space shuttle with Windows Vista. Again, Microsoft is trying to push the "experience" on you - and giving you something to look at while you wait for its performance ratings to complete. I’m told a clean install is not that bad, but you have to wonder how many end users are going to be doing a clean install. In truth, the upgrade didn’t take more than around 45 minutes for me, though I’ve had others say it took them over an hour. I could see upgrading from XP taking longer, if only because most upgrade candidates will have big registries and more cruft for the installer to sort through. JoeUser.com - JoeUser.com: Vista 5536: Is there time to fix it?

Popular Posts

Comments are closed.


Please read our Disclaimer